The prompt
Research [topic]. Give a 200-word summary, 5 key facts each with a source link, and 3 open questions experts still debate. What it is
This is a short, reusable AI prompt. You replace [topic] with a subject, and it asks for a fixed three-part brief: a 200-word summary, five key facts each with a source link, and three open questions that experts still debate. The fixed structure gives a quick, consistent overview of an unfamiliar subject.
Who it's for
- Developers who need a fast orientation on an unfamiliar technology or concept
- Students and researchers starting a literature search
- Writers and analysts who want a starting point with sources to follow up
- Team leads preparing a short briefing on a topic
Requirements
Requirements
- Access to an AI assistant or chat model that accepts text prompts
- A specific topic to put in place of [topic]
- Willingness to open and check the source links the response provides
Examples
Technology topic
PromptResearch WebAssembly outside the browser. Give a 200-word summary, 5 key facts each with a source link, and 3 open questions experts still debate.Expected output: A roughly 200-word overview of server-side and edge use of WebAssembly, five sourced facts, and three unresolved questions.
Science topic
PromptResearch the gut microbiome and mental health. Give a 200-word summary, 5 key facts each with a source link, and 3 open questions experts still debate.Expected output: A concise summary of the current understanding, five facts with links to sources, and three points of ongoing scientific debate.
Economics topic
PromptResearch universal basic income pilot programs. Give a 200-word summary, 5 key facts each with a source link, and 3 open questions experts still debate.Expected output: A short overview of pilot programs, five facts each linked to a source, and three questions economists and policy researchers still disagree on.
Pros & cons
Pros
- Pro:Fixed three-part structure gives consistent, scannable output
- Pro:Each of the five facts is requested with a source link, which makes follow-up checking possible
- Pro:The open-questions section shows where a topic is still contested
- Pro:The 200-word limit keeps the summary short
- Pro:Works for any subject because only [topic] changes
Cons
- Con:The prompt does not specify audience, depth or tone, so results may vary in level
- Con:It sets no date range or source-quality criteria, so source choice is left to the model
- Con:It does not say what to do if fewer than five well-sourced facts exist
- Con:Source links in the output still need manual verification
Tips
- Make the topic specific, for example a subfield or a question, instead of a single broad word
- Open every source link and check that it supports the fact
- Count the facts and questions to confirm the response followed the 5 and 3 requirements
- Ask a follow-up about any fact or open question you want to explore further
Variations
- Change the numbers, for example a 100-word summary, 3 facts and 2 open questions for a shorter brief
- Add an audience, such as "explain for a beginner" or "for a senior engineer"
- Ask for a specific time frame, such as sources from the last five years
- Ask for the output in a set format, such as a bulleted list or a table
- Ask for a short list of terms to search next